Revolutionizing

R&D Data Tsunami

with GenAI

A revolutionary bio-intelligence software platform empowering customers with automated clinical and regulatory intelligence so they can focus on what is most important for them – Strategy!

Revolutionizing

R&D Data Tsunami

with GenAI

A revolutionary bio-intelligence software platform empowering customers with automated clinical and regulatory intelligence so they can focus on what is most important for them – Strategy!

Revolutionizing

R&D Data Tsunami

with GenAI

A revolutionary bio-intelligence software platform empowering customers with automated clinical and regulatory intelligence so they can focus on what is most important for them – Strategy!

ria

RIA (R&D Intelligence Assistant) provides access to global approval landscapes and submission requirements to labeling insights and application transitions. RIA delivers precise, research-backed answers—so you can move forward with confidence.

Value offered by RIA - Every insight, accelerated by intelligence!

Conduct Precedence Analysis with our

Subject Matter AI Expert

Conduct Precedence Analysis with our

Subject Matter AI Expert

RIA helps you

Find needle in a haystack

RIA Eliminates

Time consuming manual research and sifting through endless documents

create a summary of applications using "project orbis"

AI Response

Overview of Project Orbis Applications and Participating Countries

Project Orbis is an initiative led by the US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence to facilitate concurrent submission and review of oncology products among international regulatory partners. The program aims to expedite patient access to innovative cancer treatments across multiple countries by enabling collaborative, parallel review processes.


Below is a summary of applications utilizing Project Orbis and the countries participating in these collaborative reviews, based on the provided regulatory correspondence.

Applications Using Project Orbis

Trametinib Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Dabrafenib Mesylate (Novartis)

Indications: Pediatric glioma and other BRAF-mutant cancers.

Project Orbis Participation: Novartis was recommended to submit these applications via Project Orbis for both trametinib and dabrafenib, including pediatric formulations.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom (with the specific plan for this application including Brazil, Israel, Singapore, and Switzerland due to local filing

strategies)

1

2

Asparaginase Erwinia Chrysanthemi (Recombinant)-Rywn (Jazz Pharmaceuticals)

Indication: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.

Project Orbis Participation: The FDA discussed the application with Project Orbis partners, and several countries expressed interest in reviewing under Project Orbis Type B or C submission plans.

Countries Involved: Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland (with the sponsor to confirm timelines and

strategies)

3

Asciminib Hydrochloride (Novartis)

Indication: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including T315I mutation.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended Project Orbis participation, pending a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

4

5

Quizartinib Dihydrochloride (Daiichi Sankyo)

Indication: Acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3-ITD positive).

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended consideration of Project Orbis, requiring a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

6

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

7

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

8

Talquetamab-Tgvs

Indication: Multiple myeloma.

Project Orbis Participation: Sponsor planned to participate in Project Orbis for the initial BLA submission; FDA requested a global submission plan to alert Project Orbis Partners.

Countries Involved: Seven Project Orbis Partners (not individually listed in the excerpt, but consistent with

the standard group: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom)

9

Axatilimab-CSFR

Indication: Not specified in the excerpt, but related to oncology.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended use of Project Orbis and submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed, but aligns with standard Project Orbis partners

10

Executive Summary

Project Orbis is a collaborative regulatory initiative designed to accelerate access to innovative oncology therapies through simultaneous review by multiple international agencies. Applications for drugs such as trametinib, dabrafenib, asparaginase, asciminib, quizartinib, datopotamab deruxtecan, talquetamab, and axatilimab have utilized or planned to utilize Project Orbis. The core participating countries are Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Participation requires a global submission plan and, often, additional documentation to support joint review. This approach streamlines regulatory processes and aims to bring life-saving therapies to patients more quickly across multiple regions

create a summary of applications using "project orbis"

AI Response

Overview of Project Orbis Applications and Participating Countries

Project Orbis is an initiative led by the US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence to facilitate concurrent submission and review of oncology products among international regulatory partners. The program aims to expedite patient access to innovative cancer treatments across multiple countries by enabling collaborative, parallel review processes.


Below is a summary of applications utilizing Project Orbis and the countries participating in these collaborative reviews, based on the provided regulatory correspondence.

Applications Using Project Orbis

Trametinib Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Dabrafenib Mesylate (Novartis)

Indications: Pediatric glioma and other BRAF-mutant cancers.

Project Orbis Participation: Novartis was recommended to submit these applications via Project Orbis for both trametinib and dabrafenib, including pediatric formulations.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom (with the specific plan for this application including Brazil, Israel, Singapore, and Switzerland due to local filing

strategies)

1

2

Asparaginase Erwinia Chrysanthemi (Recombinant)-Rywn (Jazz Pharmaceuticals)

Indication: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.

Project Orbis Participation: The FDA discussed the application with Project Orbis partners, and several countries expressed interest in reviewing under Project Orbis Type B or C submission plans.

Countries Involved: Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland (with the sponsor to confirm timelines and

strategies)

3

Asciminib Hydrochloride (Novartis)

Indication: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including T315I mutation.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended Project Orbis participation, pending a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

4

5

Quizartinib Dihydrochloride (Daiichi Sankyo)

Indication: Acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3-ITD positive).

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended consideration of Project Orbis, requiring a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

6

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

7

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

8

Talquetamab-Tgvs

Indication: Multiple myeloma.

Project Orbis Participation: Sponsor planned to participate in Project Orbis for the initial BLA submission; FDA requested a global submission plan to alert Project Orbis Partners.

Countries Involved: Seven Project Orbis Partners (not individually listed in the excerpt, but consistent with

the standard group: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom)

9

Axatilimab-CSFR

Indication: Not specified in the excerpt, but related to oncology.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended use of Project Orbis and submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed, but aligns with standard Project Orbis partners

10

Executive Summary

Project Orbis is a collaborative regulatory initiative designed to accelerate access to innovative oncology therapies through simultaneous review by multiple international agencies. Applications for drugs such as trametinib, dabrafenib, asparaginase, asciminib, quizartinib, datopotamab deruxtecan, talquetamab, and axatilimab have utilized or planned to utilize Project Orbis. The core participating countries are Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Participation requires a global submission plan and, often, additional documentation to support joint review. This approach streamlines regulatory processes and aims to bring life-saving therapies to patients more quickly across multiple regions

create a summary of applications using "project orbis"

AI Response

Overview of Project Orbis Applications and Participating Countries

Project Orbis is an initiative led by the US FDA Oncology Center of Excellence to facilitate concurrent submission and review of oncology products among international regulatory partners. The program aims to expedite patient access to innovative cancer treatments across multiple countries by enabling collaborative, parallel review processes.

Below is a summary of applications utilizing Project Orbis and the countries participating in these collaborative reviews, based on the provided regulatory correspondence.

Applications Using Project Orbis

Trametinib Dimethyl Sulfoxide and Dabrafenib Mesylate (Novartis)

Indications: Pediatric glioma and other BRAF-mutant cancers.

Project Orbis Participation: Novartis was recommended to submit these applications via Project Orbis for both trametinib and dabrafenib, including pediatric formulations.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom (with the specific plan for this application including Brazil, Israel, Singapore, and Switzerland due to local filing

Asparaginase Erwinia Chrysanthemi (Recombinant)-Rywn (Jazz Pharmaceuticals)

Indication: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma.

Project Orbis Participation: The FDA discussed the application with Project Orbis partners, and several countries expressed interest in reviewing under Project Orbis Type B or C submission plans.

Countries Involved: Australia, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland (with the sponsor to confirm timelines and

strategies)

3

Asciminib Hydrochloride (Novartis)

Indication: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), including T315I mutation.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended Project Orbis participation, pending a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

4

5

Quizartinib Dihydrochloride (Daiichi Sankyo)

Indication: Acute myeloid leukemia (FLT3-ITD positive).

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended consideration of Project Orbis, requiring a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

6

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

7

Datopotamab Deruxtecan-DLNK

Indication: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA confirmed that multiple applications for the same product can qualify for Project Orbis, and recommended submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed in the excerpt, but Project Orbis typically includes Australia, Brazil,

Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom

8

Talquetamab-Tgvs

Indication: Multiple myeloma.

Project Orbis Participation: Sponsor planned to participate in Project Orbis for the initial BLA submission; FDA requested a global submission plan to alert Project Orbis Partners.

Countries Involved: Seven Project Orbis Partners (not individually listed in the excerpt, but consistent with

the standard group: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom)

9

Axatilimab-CSFR

Indication: Not specified in the excerpt, but related to oncology.

Project Orbis Participation: FDA recommended use of Project Orbis and submission of a global submission plan.

Countries Involved: Not explicitly listed, but aligns with standard Project Orbis partners

10

Executive Summary

Project Orbis is a collaborative regulatory initiative designed to accelerate access to innovative oncology therapies through simultaneous review by multiple international agencies. Applications for drugs such as trametinib, dabrafenib, asparaginase, asciminib, quizartinib, datopotamab deruxtecan, talquetamab, and axatilimab have utilized or planned to utilize Project Orbis. The core participating countries are Australia, Brazil, Canada, Israel, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Participation requires a global submission plan and, often, additional documentation to support joint review. This approach streamlines regulatory processes and aims to bring life-saving therapies to patients more quickly across multiple regions

Track Regulatory Changes and

Get AI Insights

Track Regulatory Changes and Get Insights
- Powered by AI

RIA helps you

Stay informed with real-time updates on evolving global regulations

RIA Eliminates

Manual monitoring and delayed awareness of regulatory changes

Guidance Summary

FDA Releases Draft Guidance to Mitigate Sepsis Transmission Risks in Human Cell and Tissue Products

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Draft Guidance for Industry titled Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps), effective May 2, 2025. This guidance aims to enhance the safety protocols surrounding donor eligibility determinations, specifically addressing the risks associated with sepsis transmission through HCT/Ps.


This draft guidance serves as an update to the previously established August 2007 HCT/P guidance on donor eligibility and incorporates findings from more recent public health investigations, particularly those related to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infections linked to HCT/Ps. The FDA recognizes the urgency of these updates, necessitating stakeholder comments to refine the guidance further.


Key Recommendations include:


Establishments must conduct comprehensive screenings of donors for risk factors, clinical evidence, and physical signs of sepsis.

Any ineligible donor identified due to medical history, clinical observations, or physical evidence associated with sepsis must be documented and excluded.

Medical records should be reviewed thoroughly, and communication with primary care physicians is encouraged when assessing donor eligibility.

While specific tests for sepsis detection are not available, establishments should perform testing for pathogenic agents that could lead to sepsis as part of the eligibility determination process.

The guidance underscores the classification of sepsis as a relevant communicable disease agent (RCDAD), maintaining its relevance in 21 CFR 1271.3(r)(2) and addressing increased scrutiny on donor safety to prevent further infections. By refining these protocols, the FDA aims to safeguard recipients and ensure higher standards of donor eligibility assessment, responding directly to evolving public health needs.


Under this draft, feedback from industry stakeholders is vital, and the FDA encourages comments to be submitted electronically or in writing by the date specified in the Federal Register's notice of availability. This effort reflects the agency’s commitment to enhancing public health safety while adapting to scientific advancements and emerging health threats related to tissue and cellular transplants.

Verify

Report

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

New Alert

1h ago

36 New FDA Guidelines Added

Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps): Draft Draft Guidance for Industry (1)

New Guidance document by CBER was added

Guideline document FertiPro N.V. HSA-containing ART media - Procedural steps and scientific in.. was added

New Guidance document by CBER was added

+34 more

Guidance Summary

FDA Releases Draft Guidance to Mitigate Sepsis Transmission Risks in Human Cell and Tissue Products

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Draft Guidance for Industry titled Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps), effective May 2, 2025. This guidance aims to enhance the safety protocols surrounding donor eligibility determinations, specifically addressing the risks associated with sepsis transmission through HCT/Ps.


This draft guidance serves as an update to the previously established August 2007 HCT/P guidance on donor eligibility and incorporates findings from more recent public health investigations, particularly those related to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infections linked to HCT/Ps. The FDA recognizes the urgency of these updates, necessitating stakeholder comments to refine the guidance further.


Key Recommendations include:


Establishments must conduct comprehensive screenings of donors for risk factors, clinical evidence, and physical signs of sepsis.

Any ineligible donor identified due to medical history, clinical observations, or physical evidence associated with sepsis must be documented and excluded.

Medical records should be reviewed thoroughly, and communication with primary care physicians is encouraged when assessing donor eligibility.

While specific tests for sepsis detection are not available, establishments should perform testing for pathogenic agents that could lead to sepsis as part of the eligibility determination process.

The guidance underscores the classification of sepsis as a relevant communicable disease agent (RCDAD), maintaining its relevance in 21 CFR 1271.3(r)(2) and addressing increased scrutiny on donor safety to prevent further infections. By refining these protocols, the FDA aims to safeguard recipients and ensure higher standards of donor eligibility assessment, responding directly to evolving public health needs.


Under this draft, feedback from industry stakeholders is vital, and the FDA encourages comments to be submitted electronically or in writing by the date specified in the Federal Register's notice of availability. This effort reflects the agency’s commitment to enhancing public health safety while adapting to scientific advancements and emerging health threats related to tissue and cellular transplants.

Verify

Report

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

New Alert

1h ago

36 New FDA Guidelines Added

Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps): Draft Draft Guidance for Industry (1)

New Guidance document by CBER was added

Guideline document FertiPro N.V. HSA-containing ART media - Procedural steps and scientific in.. was added

New Guidance document by CBER was added

+34 more

Guidance Summary

FDA Releases Draft Guidance to Mitigate Sepsis Transmission Risks in Human Cell and Tissue Products

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Draft Guidance for Industry titled Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps), effective May 2, 2025. This guidance aims to enhance the safety protocols surrounding donor eligibility determinations, specifically addressing the risks associated with sepsis transmission through HCT/Ps.


This draft guidance serves as an update to the previously established August 2007 HCT/P guidance on donor eligibility and incorporates findings from more recent public health investigations, particularly those related to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infections linked to HCT/Ps. The FDA recognizes the urgency of these updates, necessitating stakeholder comments to refine the guidance further.


Key Recommendations include:


Establishments must conduct comprehensive screenings of donors for risk factors, clinical evidence, and physical signs of sepsis.

Any ineligible donor identified due to medical history, clinical observations, or physical evidence associated with sepsis must be documented and excluded.

Medical records should be reviewed thoroughly, and communication with primary care physicians is encouraged when assessing donor eligibility.

While specific tests for sepsis detection are not available, establishments should perform testing for pathogenic agents that could lead to sepsis as part of the eligibility determination process.

The guidance underscores the classification of sepsis as a relevant communicable disease agent (RCDAD), maintaining its relevance in 21 CFR 1271.3(r)(2) and addressing increased scrutiny on donor safety to prevent further infections. By refining these protocols, the FDA aims to safeguard recipients and ensure higher standards of donor eligibility assessment, responding directly to evolving public health needs.


Under this draft, feedback from industry stakeholders is vital, and the FDA encourages comments to be submitted electronically or in writing by the date specified in the Federal Register's notice of availability. This effort reflects the agency’s commitment to enhancing public health safety while adapting to scientific advancements and emerging health threats related to tissue and cellular transplants.

Verify

Report

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

US-FDA - Guidelines

1h ago

36 New Guidelines Added

3 more notifications

New Alert

1h ago

36 New FDA Guidelines Added

Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transmission of Disease Agents Associated with Sepsis by Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and Tissue-Based Products (HCT/Ps): Draft Draft Guidance for Industry (1)

New Guidance document by CBER was added

Guideline document FertiPro N.V. HSA-containing ART media - Procedural steps and scientific in.. was added

New Guidance document by CBER was added

+34 more

Landscape and Feasibility Analysis

Landscape and Feasibility Analysis

RIA helps you

Quickly identify relevant applications and clinical trials for feasibility analysis

RIA Eliminates

Hours of manual research across disconnected sources and scattered endpoints

Clinical Trials

Skin care behaviors among melanoma survivors and their families

The impact of a prevention program on sun risks in primary school in tropical french region

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Galectin inhibitor (gr-md-02) and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

Ido inhibitor study for relapsed or refractory solid tumors

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 2

Phase 1

Phase 1

Phase 1

Applications

Tecelra

·

Proleukin

·

Cotellic

·

Melanoma

Clinical Trials

Skin care behaviors among melanoma survivors and their families

The impact of a prevention program on sun risks in primary school in tropical french region

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Galectin inhibitor (gr-md-02) and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

Ido inhibitor study for relapsed or refractory solid tumors

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 2

Phase 1

Phase 1

Phase 1

Applications

Tecelra

·

Proleukin

·

Cotellic

·

Melanoma

Clinical Trials

Skin care behaviors among melanoma survivors and their families

The impact of a prevention program on sun risks in primary school in tropical french region

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Galectin inhibitor (gr-md-02) and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma

Ido inhibitor study for relapsed or refractory solid tumors

Ranibizumab as adjuvant therapy for the treatment of choroidal melanoma (cohort 2)

Phase 2

Phase 3

Phase 2

Phase 1

Phase 1

Phase 1

Applications

Tecelra

·

Proleukin

·

Cotellic

·

Melanoma

Labeling - Comparing, Monitoring and Analyzing Powered by AI

Labeling - Comparing, Monitoring and Analyzing Powered by AI

RIA helps you

Instantly compare labels & extract meaningful regulatory distinctions

RIA Eliminates

Time-consuming manual reviews and static label tracking processes

Label Comparison

LABEL

Tecelra

ORIG-1

LABEL

Mektovi

ORIG-1

Comparison Summary

Summary of Substantive Differences Between Tecelra and Mektovi Labels

  1. Indications and Patient Selection

Tecelra is indicated for adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma, requiring prior chemotherapy, specific HLA-A*02 alleles, and MAGE-A4 antigen expression (confirmed by companion diagnostic). Approval is under accelerated approval based on response rate.

Mektovi is indicated for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E/K mutations, used only in combination with encorafenib. Requires BRAF mutation testing.

  1. Contraindications

Tecelra: Contraindicated in patients with HLA-A*02:05P genotype (requires genetic screening).

Mektovi: No contraindications listed.

  1. Dosage and Administration

Tecelra: Single IV infusion of genetically modified autologous T cells after lymphodepleting chemotherapy; requires cryostorage, thawing, and strict identity checks.Mektovi: Oral tablet (45 mg BID), chronic dosing, always with encorafenib; extensive dose modification guidance for toxicities.

Verify

Report

Label Comparison

LABEL

Tecelra

ORIG-1

LABEL

Mektovi

ORIG-1

Comparison Summary

Summary of Substantive Differences Between Tecelra and Mektovi Labels

  1. Indications and Patient Selection

Tecelra is indicated for adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma, requiring prior chemotherapy, specific HLA-A*02 alleles, and MAGE-A4 antigen expression (confirmed by companion diagnostic). Approval is under accelerated approval based on response rate.

Mektovi is indicated for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E/K mutations, used only in combination with encorafenib. Requires BRAF mutation testing.

  1. Contraindications

Tecelra: Contraindicated in patients with HLA-A*02:05P genotype (requires genetic screening).

Mektovi: No contraindications listed.

  1. Dosage and Administration

Tecelra: Single IV infusion of genetically modified autologous T cells after lymphodepleting chemotherapy; requires cryostorage, thawing, and strict identity checks.Mektovi: Oral tablet (45 mg BID), chronic dosing, always with encorafenib; extensive dose modification guidance for toxicities.

Verify

Report

Label Comparison

LABEL

Tecelra

ORIG-1

LABEL

Mektovi

ORIG-1

Comparison Summary

Summary of Substantive Differences Between Tecelra and Mektovi Labels

  1. Indications and Patient Selection

Tecelra is indicated for adults with unresectable or metastatic synovial sarcoma, requiring prior chemotherapy, specific HLA-A*02 alleles, and MAGE-A4 antigen expression (confirmed by companion diagnostic). Approval is under accelerated approval based on response rate.

Mektovi is indicated for unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E/K mutations, used only in combination with encorafenib. Requires BRAF mutation testing.

  1. Contraindications

Tecelra: Contraindicated in patients with HLA-A*02:05P genotype (requires genetic screening).

Mektovi: No contraindications listed.

  1. Dosage and Administration

Tecelra: Single IV infusion of genetically modified autologous T cells after lymphodepleting chemotherapy; requires cryostorage, thawing, and strict identity checks.Mektovi: Oral tablet (45 mg BID), chronic dosing, always with encorafenib; extensive dose modification guidance for toxicities.

Verify

Report

RIA Innovative Features

RIA streamlines regulatory intelligence with AI-powered search, intuitive analytics, and seamless document comparisons—helping you make faster, informed decisions

Natural Language search on complex documents

Find examples where US FDA approved products solely based on foreign clinical data

Find examples where US FDA approved products solely based on foreign clinical data

Search

Search

Searching from 107855 documents and 2,710,245 pages

Searching from 107855 documents and 2,710,245 pages

Tecelra

Tecelra

·

·

Proleukin

Proleukin

·

·

Proleukin

Proleukin

·

·

Cotellic

Cotellic

·

·

Intuitive Search Functionality and
Industry Best User Experience
Expedite your understanding with our AI Assistant - ChatRIA

N

You

Please summarize the efficacy study design for renal cell carcinoma

AI Response

The efficacy study design for renal cell carcinoma involved a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, international study called BO17705. The study compared the combination of interferon alfa and bevacizumab with interferon alfa and placebo in treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who had undergone a nephrectomy. A total of 649 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or placebo with interferon alfa (9 MIU subcutaneously three times weekly for a maximum of 52 weeks). Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary outcome measure. The study found that PFS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared to the placebo group, but there was no significant improvement in OS.

Verify

Report

1/2

N

You

Please summarize the efficacy study design for renal cell carcinoma

AI Response

The efficacy study design for renal cell carcinoma involved a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, international study called BO17705. The study compared the combination of interferon alfa and bevacizumab with interferon alfa and placebo in treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who had undergone a nephrectomy. A total of 649 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) or placebo with interferon alfa (9 MIU subcutaneously three times weekly for a maximum of 52 weeks). Patients were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The main outcome measure was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary outcome measure. The study found that PFS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared to the placebo group, but there was no significant improvement in OS.

Verify

Report

1/2

Advanced analytics such as
AdComm, Guidance, PMR/C, ​ Pediatrics, CDP, & Expedited Pathways due to unique data model

Public

Consultation

Orphan

Designation

Compliance

Letter

Drug Development

Tool (DDT)

HTA

EMA Meetings

Pediatrics

PMR/PMC

Label

Comparison

Clinical Development

Plan (CDP)

Regulatory

360

Guideline

Advisory

Committee

Expedite

Pathway

Orphan

Designation

Public

Consultation

Orphan

Designation

Compliance

Letter

Drug Development

Tool (DDT)

HTA

EMA

Meetings

Pediatrics

PMR/PMC

Label

Comparison

Clinical

Development

Plan (CDP)

Regulatory

360

Guideline

Advisory

Committee

Expedite
Pathway

Orphan

Designation

Automate workflows to enhance efficiency, save time, and reduce errors.

Regulatory 360

Regulatory 360

Pediatrics

Pediatrics

Guideline

Guideline

EMA Meetings

EMA Meetings

Automation

investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary

outcome measure. The study found that PFS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared to the placebo group, but there was no significant improvement in OS.

investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS) as a secondary

outcome measure. The study found that PFS was significantly longer in the bevacizumab group compared to the placebo group, but there was no significant improvement in OS.

Verify

Verify

Keep hands on the wheel
Verify & Use AI generated data
with assurance!
Product Label, Pediatric, & Guidance Comparisons​

Hear it from Innovators

Ready to Innovate?

Let’s start your journey toward innovation. Get in touch with us today to see how Vivpro can empower your team and drive your success.